Private Companies vs the First Amendment
When it
comes to the first Amendment, the government must abide by the laws of the
land. Including the first amendment. This isn’t necessarily the same when
it comes to private companies. One of those companies that often does what they
want instead of abiding by the first amendment is YouTube. They hold the power
to keep or delete any videos off of their platform that they so desire to get
rid of. People sometimes claim that their video getting removed or getting age
restricted by YouTube violates their 1st amendment rights, but
YouTube has not violated anybody’s rights if they so choose to do this. An
Example of this is a recent Supreme Court Case involving YouTube and Prager
University where YouTube put age restrictions on some of Prager University’s
videos. Prager University’s YouTube Channel is a conservative body where they talk
about important issues involving the US Constitution. The case was discussing if
YouTube must be a platform for free speech for anybody. The case was ultimately
thrown out because the Court ruled that YouTube is not a “’state actor’ bound
by the First Amendment.” The part of this that makes no sense to me is that
Prager University claims to understand how the 1st amendment works
based on the content of their YouTube videos. This leads me to believe that
they would already know that this case would be thrown out because YouTube is a
private company. Not a government body.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/26/youtube-court-first-amendment-117769
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/26/youtube-court-first-amendment-117769
Comments
Post a Comment